|
RioBrand's Industry DiaryLondon: 1 March 2001
- Picking up the scent of brand protection
- Who's examining your application?
- And the value of your good name
The sweet smell of rejection
A decision by the UK Trade Marks Registry, refusing to register
the smell of cinnamon as a trade mark for furniture, has been
upheld on appeal. The application was filed by John Lewis of
Hungerford plc as soon as the current UK Trade Marks Act - with its
broader definition of what types of mark may be registered - came
into force in October 1994. The application was finally refused
protection in December 2000 following a hearing before Geoffrey
Hobbs QC.
Smells are perhaps the most controversial of the unorthodox trade
marks being recognised under the laws of an increasing number of
countries. The case contrasts with last year's decision by a Board
of Appeal at the Office for the Harmonisation of the Internal Market
(OHIM) which over-ruled the original refusal to register the smell
of new-mown grass as a European Community Trade Mark (CTM)
for tennis balls.
Meanwhile the European Court of Justice (ECJ) is preparing to
issue an important ruling in a case involving a smell trade mark
which has been referred to it by the German courts: Dr Ralf
Sieckmann vs Deutsches Patent- und Markenamt. The ECJ will be
addressing fundamental questions such as whether the definition of a
registrable mark laid down in the Directive harmonising the trade
mark laws of member states extends to non-visual signs (such as
smells and sounds), and if so what is a suitable method of
representing them.
The ECJ ruling is expected to provide national courts and trade
mark registries, as well as brand owners, with vital clarification
of the degree to which smells will be protectable within the EU and
help to reduce the controversy surrounding this topic. Further
applications in the pipeline, whose fates hang on the ECJ decision,
include a CTM application to register the smell of vanilla for a
wide range of goods ranging from clothing, jewellery and stationery
through to skin patches, perfumes and confectionery.
Whatever the courts' decisions about registrability, some brand
owners are certain to persist in pursuing their fascination with
fragrances and will continue to see them as valuable
distinguishing components of the brand offer. For example, according
to a report in the Daily Telegraph, British Airways is
currently developing and testing a special aroma to 'enhance the
environment and try to counteract the inherent aircraft smell' of
the toilets in its first class cabins. According to Georgie Bridge,
the airline's design management executive, 'the aim is that
eventually our aroma could become as strong an element in brand
recognition as other elements of our corporate identity'.
UAE Patent Office outsources patent examination
During the last decade most big businesses have outsourced an
increasing range of services, with responsibility for everything
from payroll to catering passing from in-house departments to
external specialists. Now patent offices are following suit and
making increased use of the practice, even for key functions.
Training of colleagues from overseas patent offices has long been
undertaken by some registries but according to a report in the Saba
Bulletin, the United Arab Emirates Patent Office has recently
appointed the Austrian Patent Office to undertake substantive
examination of UAE patent applications. Applications filed in the
UAE will be mailed to Austria where searches for relevant prior
patents and novelty examinations will be conducted.
Could we see outsourcing of examination spreading in the future,
with other countries following suit and perhaps even applying the
procedure to their trade mark and design applications as well?
Name your price
What is generally considered to be the most valuable domain name
in the world, sex.com, is reported to be on the market, with an
asking price of $85 million. On many internet search engines the
word "sex" is the most searched word, a level of popularity that
explains why the name is so highly prized. The name's present owner
- who has described it as "a licence to print money" - had to go to
court to retrieve the name from someone who had forged a signature
on a Network Solutions transfer document.
Meanwhile, in a decision relating to the domain name
'financialreview.com', WIPO's Arbitration and Mediation Center has
issued a ruling that confirms it is a legitimate business activity
to register domain names consisting of generic terms and to then
offer them for sale -a decision which appears to sanction the
speculative registration of domain names, provided no third
party trade marks are involved. The WIPO panel held that the
complainant had failed to convince them that the registrant had
protected the name with the specific intention of selling it to them
or one of their competitors. The panel went on to reject allegations
of bad faith and expressed the view that until the complaint was
filed the American registrant was unlikely to have been aware of the
trade mark rights owned by the Australian complainant.
...and finally
We notice that the Eurostar logo has been registered in Brazil
and in Thailand. And you thought Eurotunnel had stopped digging when
they reached Calais...
Diary Index
Home
Note: Although every effort has
been made to ensure the accuracy of items appearing in this feature,
readers are urged to make their own checks or take independent
advice on matters of concern or interest.
|